
Steve Hazeldine
GBUseful but Flawed It does identify some real issues but when those are fixed it often does not recognize that. A re-crawl does not immediately update what they show either. Probably worth using for a month to see any potential large issues then ditch it. (Support seem reluctant to read what one writes and just spout stock "answers'). I cannot recommend this tool. Comments/Reply from SiteChecker omit to mention extensive info sent to them in response. Bottom line is their identification of "title duplicates" while initially correct was wholly wrong after the issue was corrected.

Lukasz Wojnarowicz
PLUseful and insightful Due to my non commercial activity could not use it much but I find it insightful especially useful for someone who is not profesional web developer.

Татьяна Бучинская
ESSitechecker rocks! I've been a power user of Sitechecker for a few years now, the switch from Ahrefs was painless and we find that the data is far more accurate. We have over 10 projects being tracked in here and when you pair the project tools with GA/GSC really gives a fully rounded view of whats going on. This is a must have for a business taking digital serious.

Bhuvnesh Blog
INGood website -

Omar Kat
GBWorst experience ever Been in SEO for over 20 years, and used many tools, this is by far the worst. The free trial is not really free and they ended up taking over 350$ from me during that period, avoid this tool.