Sitechecker

Peterburi tee 47, 11415, Tallinn, Estonia
image
4.40
Based on 20 Reviews

5

75.00%

4

10.00%

3

5.00%

2

0.00%

1

10.00%
About Sitechecker

Sitechecker gives detailed tips how to improve the search visibility of your websites and helps to track your overall SEO progress.

Tags
Contact Info

You need to Login first to submit your review.

image
Mimmi
SE

Do NOT fall for this scam Do NOT fall for this scam And once you have them in the email they spam you all day long And the unsubscribe does not work and not their contact form either They do everything to avoid customer contact Scam times ten and the good review here they have bought

image
Alvaro Andres Salom
CA

Excelent! I recently had a great experience with Trustpilot. The site was incredibly user-friendly, with a clean and intuitive interface that made navigation a breeze. I was particularly impressed with the reliability of the service; everything worked smoothly without any glitches. The customer support was responsive and helpful, answering my queries promptly. I highly recommend trustpilot to anyone looking for a dependable and easy-to-use platform.

image
Lukasz Wojnarowicz
PL

Useful and insightful Due to my non commercial activity could not use it much but I find it insightful especially useful for someone who is not profesional web developer.

image
Omar Kat
GB

Worst experience ever Been in SEO for over 20 years, and used many tools, this is by far the worst. The free trial is not really free and they ended up taking over 350$ from me during that period, avoid this tool.

image
Steve Hazeldine
GB

Useful but Flawed It does identify some real issues but when those are fixed it often does not recognize that. A re-crawl does not immediately update what they show either. Probably worth using for a month to see any potential large issues then ditch it. (Support seem reluctant to read what one writes and just spout stock "answers'). I cannot recommend this tool. Comments/Reply from SiteChecker omit to mention extensive info sent to them in response. Bottom line is their identification of "title duplicates" while initially correct was wholly wrong after the issue was corrected.

We may use cookies or any other tracking technologies when you visit our website, including any other media form, mobile website, or mobile application related or connected to help customize the Site and improve your experience. learn more

Allow