cheap wording, typing errors. they are not native speaker, mostly likely from india. turning my premium products to cheap words and typing error. spelling errors caused by not checking before sending. editing service? totally a joke! the worst of the worst

Extremely satisfied with Narrato! Extremely satisfied with Narrato! Their platform is extremely easy to navigate through and use. Writers are professionals, who communicate well and meet content requirements and deadlines bang on point (even before in most cases)! Keep up the great work!

“Highly recommended platform” “Highly recommended platform” We’re a marketing company and were looking for a better freelance platform to hire content writers. We had worked with UpWork, Fiverr, etc. in the past - but these were tedious and hit or a miss in terms of quality. We started with the $1 trial (a 300 word blog post) on Narrato to check if they matched the quality of content we were looking for - and they did! We now get 30+ content pieces (blog posts and some website copy) done every month and are very happy with the outcome. The option to mark writers as preferred and block some is great, as it helped us fine tune our writer-set. All in all - narrato is easy to use, quick and very flexible. Highly recommended.

Best Tool for Content Workflow! It's an amazing tool, the content workflow features are just out of this world! Have streamlined the whole content workflow and allowed our team members to overlook the whole process. The AI system is pretty powerful itself so we get a better refined and crisp content piece at the end of the day :)

Much worse than when it used to be Godot Back when this company was known as Godot, we'd occasionally ask them to write new English articles based on existing material. "Here's a bunch of articles about immigration to country X, write a new article without outright plagiarizing and incorporate a list of keywords". These were written moderately well, by someone who apparently spoke English and understood how rewrite several sources into a coherent whole. This sort of simple task is no longer within the company's capacity, even if you pay for the most costly available tier. The result is written by someone who only sort of speaks English, can't follow even the most basic of instructions ("format the article so that sub-headlines present a question that the following paragraph answers") and just randomly scatters bits of pieces of information gathered from a cursory google search around the article without the ability to form them into a coherent or understandable whole. Original research or new ideas were never expected, but a decently readable regurgitation of already available content is the very minimal standard this company now fails.