It depends.... It depends.... I have been through Level 1 and 2, currently "GTS". I honestly think it depends on your patient population. For your younger and more athletic populations I find it to be an effective treatment intervention. For more chronic "layered" dysfunction, chronic pain/hypersensitivity, and older de-conditioned populations do not seem to respond as well to it. I know the instructors would disagree, but like most other instructors for con-ed courses I have taken over the years, they are in Private Practice and/or in a franchised clinics that mostly treats athletes and/or more active, healthy individuals. Working for a hospital system where you see many unhealthy, deconditioned individuals, I feel that Graston is not as effective. I am still glad I have been through the training, am certified, and have the intervention in my assessment/treatment tool-box for appropriate patients.

Being a Graston Technique Specialist… Being a Graston Technique Specialist has helped me to cure 100s of people and has increased my business tremendously. Best thing, next to becoming a chiropractor, that I have ever done.

I have added this to my repoitre for… I have added this to my repoitre for physical therapy and it has helped to facilitate patient outcomes.

Technique I use daily and see some of… Technique I use daily and see some of the best results w/ my athletes. The quality of the training and application is one of the best courses I have taken as an Athletic Trainer.

Fantastic Assessment and Functional… Fantastic Assessment and Functional usage of these Instruments. Very effective in my Health Care Protocols Arthur Cuenco PT, ART, GT