Kate B
GBWorks, could be better If you had the interface and workflow of Freshdesk, with the added features (asset management) of Freshservice, you'd have a winner. Freshservice's API is limited (although what's there does work, it's limited and puts way too much work on FS devs to do work your own devs should be able to do), the UI is inconsistent and clunky. But, it's get the job done and the mobile app is very useful.
Carl Shriver
GBWe picked FreshService over ServiceNow We picked FreshService over ServiceNow, XenDesk and Spiceworks. The instance is easy to set up and customize, and their support is always fast and helpful. It's way cheaper than ServiceNow and gives a lot of the same features. It's not as customizable, but unless you have a very large organization, an MSP, or highly stringent requirements you can get a lot of the same functionality without paying an arm, leg, spleen and part of your first born.
Mark Heyworth
GBEver improving... We've been using Freshservice for some time and it keeps getting better. The team are really quick to respond to support issues, and the management are great at engaging with customers. They clearly want to keep improving the product and when we do find areas that don't quite meet our needs they are always keen to develop the product to overcome this, or point us in the right direction.
emotob
DEGreat potential, but buggy and with horrible support We have been using Freshservice for the last 2 years. While the product has many options and integrations, it is one of the buggiest tools I have used. We had several issues with the product; Either an integration is not working or tickets not being created during onboarding workflow, etc. Dealing with Fresh's support is another problem. We have created several tickets re. these issues and the reply was either 'test it again', 'we cannot find anything in the logs', or 'there is nothing we can do'. For an enterprise ITSM solution I find these answer unacceptable. I believe the tool has many possibilities but the amount of bugs and the bad level of support received is making us consider migrating away from it.
Australian Customer
AUThe product is OK for the price The product is OK for the price - more development is required to mature it. The support team often does not understand the issue being reported or recommend solutions that are not fit for purpose. The product needs to be more flexible, often we are told "thats not how ITIL works" and our requirements are dismissed. ITIL is a framework, not a set of laws so it would be nice if the system followed suit.