Reno Romanin
GBFeature set far beyond what you'd expect I've been using vyos since 2013. I was looking at purchasing a couple of other hardware devices from a vendor that sounds like Jupiter. There were several licensing restrictions and extra costs that would have gone into the project, but thanks to Lanner electronics and vyos, the cost dropped by about 75% and we didn't have to worry about extra licensing to do what we needed. I'm pretty much s novice when it comes to the network and network security side of the house, but our very experienced network team was more than impressed with vyos. And they were able to, not only complete, but add features, to our installation for several hundred workstations using 5Gb of bandwidth across 4 sites. Myself and a team with over 60 years of combined experience can't recommend it strongly enough.
keyvan ghadimi
DEExcelent experience of using VyOS last year I tried to use VyOS as a router in a pilot project. it was really perfect, easy to use, stable and I liked it. I used VyOs to establish IPSec tunnel to Cisco and GCP and it works perfectly. They had a great community and you will get a fast answer in case of a problem.
Robert Guice
GBI've used VyOS (Vyatta) since 2014 I've used VyOS (Vyatta) since 2014. It was the primary routing platform in an organization that supported 100+ sites and over 40,000 users. There is a learning curve for some who have come from a traditional environment, but it is an extremely flexible networking platform.
John Kerns
GBExcellent VyOS Technical Support I ran into an issue in VyOS with bridging of special frame types. I opened a case and Dmitriy immediately jumped in to help me solve it. He whipped up a kernel mod, installed it for me, and even opened a ticket to add some additional functionality into the next VyOS main release. The customer service and quality of work from the VyOS team is unmatched in the industry. I highly recommend them.
Ben Russell
GBYou guys have been great to work with… You guys have been great to work with but you are making the wrong decision with T2100 to not set check igp as default. Every other BGP implementation does this. The feedback I am getting from the networking community says that no one wants this and I have demonstrated how it breaks BGP networks. This breaks BGP in a subtle way that only becomes apparent during a reroute. I am giving this feedback to help you improve.