Redpoints - We were initially frustrated that the software took genuine products down but this was resolved eventually - nearly 3 months Redpoints - Took our products down in May 23, they were genuine items and this lead to some frustration. We complained to the company who did reverse their decision - although it took till July 23, we only wish that the software lead identification lead to a considered view rather than mass takedown

False Claims / Items taken down via… False Claims / Items taken down via ebay. This company uses AI to scan ebay/amazon listings for their client base. They will "claim" your item has violated copyright and will be taken down for "brand protection"

False Claims! Agree with others.. Redpoint reports registered sellers to market places for copyright, even though the resellers purchase the branded goods from the official distributors. In my case, they decided to get me for using the WORD 'bullet journal' which is a general term used by various companies for the type of product. Images and such used were my own. Terrible company!

Redpoints got it wrong and cost me thousands! I had my ebay business suspended because Redpoints incorrectly reported items to Vero. Redpoints did apologise and the listing were reinstated, but the suspension cost me thousands of pounds in revenue. It's great that your protect the big brands, but when you get it wrong you must compensate small businesses.

The tech must be pretty rubbish I had not heard of Red Points till yesterday when we were targeted by them. As the publisher of an international magazine with five editions, it was a surprise to receive notice that a copyright infringement accusation was levelled against us by a larger competitor—via its contractor, Red Points. The accusation was utterly baseless, and we can prove it. We can prove the sources of our story. Can they prove their position? I doubt it. And here’s the thing: Red Points’ client publishes in Spanish. We’re in English. I can’t find anything on the client site even remotely resembling our article. The technology must be pretty poor if we were flagged. I certainly wouldn’t be encouraged to use it. Judging by the other reviews here, it seems it’s not the most ethical firm. It doesn’t appear supportive of a free press—unless the media organization is paying them.