
C R
GBTry it, it's fun. Check your emails. Fun, informative. To everyone complaining you can't see your scores for free, I think I can guess yours, and it's not good news I'm afraid. You get the results emailed to you, immediately, for free. If you haven't got the sense to read the information presented to you on the website before and after the test, I don't think it's worth taking the time to check the results as they're pretty clear already.

Joe Love
GBDon't waste you're time Don't waste you're time. A search for "free IQ test" brings up iqtest.com where they advertise the test is free. Only after taking the test is there a mention of a payment of $15 to receive you're results.

Claire B
AUGood practice for the real one however… Good practice for the real one however earlier that day I had failed several different psychometric tests so was therefore quite surprised I was a borderline genius with an IQ of 144. I took the free one, which is obviously code for ‘wind up ... give us more $$$ to get the details’

Biggus Dickus
DEPaywall and account requirement to see full result The website makes it look like the IQ test is free, payment is never mentioned, but AFTER you take the test, the full result is hidden behind a paywall AND they force you to make an account just to see your score. You do get your score for free though, but ONLY after creating an account with your email. I recommend using a spam mail address or just using a different site. Clearly misleading and exploitative practices.

Samuel Putnam
GBNo, its actually free, check your gmail Don't listen to the people saying it's a scam, you can get your IQ for free (it emails you it), you just have to pay to get a full comprehensive explanation. Some people were complaining how their IQs seemed too high and that the test must be inaccurate, however there is for sure an element of survivorship bias. All the smartest people actually managed to find their IQ scores (casual flexing) I scored 125+ on a previous website (test only went to that) this gave me 131 so it seems at least remotely accurate to me.