Real journalists get a bad rep from… Real journalists get a bad rep from conspiracy theorists online on review sites like this. They hire real journalists unlike many independent news sources on the internet. Great journalists who wrote in depth pieces based on research and facts.

They describe themselves as… They describe themselves as "Independent. Intelligent. Influential." while they have been accused of biased reporting. It's not (yet) a fake news site but the coverage is often angled to prove a point. Some might like it but it's definitely not for me.

As an avid consumer of political news As an avid consumer of political news, I can unequivocally recommend The Daily Beast for their matter-of-fact, link-based, reporting. They give the reader the meat of a story. And at the end of each entry is a link to the original source of the information. Reviews that criticize TDB as too biased seem to have ignored the fact that every one of their stories is backed up with actual facts and sources. I highly recommend their excellent writing and common-sense style.

Trash newspaper Trash newspaper. Writes gossip as truth. That a joke.

Stop using the word KAREN!! I don’t mind reading news articles but when they throw so much hate on people named Karen (innocent people)for no reason I think you’re producing false articles and you put out a lot of hate on the people named Karen and I think it’s trashy it’s unprofessional. So if an article makes half the people angry well, you can rest assured by being evil, and putting the name Karen in there you can tick off half the people +300,000 named Karen