VehicleHistoryRecord.com

image
3.85
Based on 20 Reviews

5

0.00%

4

95.00%

3

0.00%

2

0.00%

1

5.00%
About VehicleHistoryRecord.com

Tags

You need to Login first to submit your review.

image
Pam A
GB

SCAM SCAM. Afifah Amani pretended to be Steve +44 7389 645092 interested in my car to get me to use site, then came up with story of why couldn't view car etc etc

image
Hay Lyn
GB

It a very detailed report. For only 1 dollar, I got correct ownership, mileage was more then expected, and history of where the car travel, and more of what was stated. Its a big bargain on car reports.

image
Bryan Reeder
GB

I was very pleased with the report and the process to get it. I was a little hesitant to use this service. As long as you carefully read the instructions, you'll get your report for a dollar. Be careful not to accidently subscribe to the $180 deal, unless your a dealer and buy a lot of cars.

image
sosueme1
GB

rather long sign in process but good information I tried this because it was advertised as $1.00.....that is a bit misleading as it not only tries to sell you a "premium" membership for far far more than $1.00 but they also bill you small amounts for things that they led you to believe were included. Not a big deal as they are .19 each.....overall I am satisfied and if they really give me my gift card for filling this out I will be astonished!

image
Rachel
GB

Pretty good - however 21 pages is a bit much VehicleHistoryRecord.com gives quite a bit of information. A bit contradictory, however. On item # 3 "History of The Vehicle" it shows that the vehicle was reported to have been in a collision with another vehicle but does not show this information in any of the other table of contents (1 - 20).......... It also shows "Reported at Auto Auction" - but does not explain what this means. Shows the title was repossessed, reported at auto auction - again - what does this mean? I would think that these questions would have been explained under "Brand Definitions" - it does show "No Collision" and explains that the vehicle has not been reported to have been damaged by a collision." Does this mean the "collision" that was reported in July 2008 caused no damage but did result in an assigned case number? Like I said, there is quite a bit of information in this report, however, it could be consolidated a bit.

We may use cookies or any other tracking technologies when you visit our website, including any other media form, mobile website, or mobile application related or connected to help customize the Site and improve your experience. learn more

Allow