Ideapod

image
4.55
Based on 20 Reviews

5

75.00%

4

15.00%

3

0.00%

2

10.00%

1

0.00%
About Ideapod

Ideapod is a digital magazine and website with the mission to redefine self-development.

Tags

You need to Login first to submit your review.

image
WD
IN

Thank you Thank you for being there during the times when I didn't have anybody, when I was lost and when I didn't want to live. You helped me get back on my feet and learn more about myself! Appreciate your work!

image
Helen
NZ

I have not had much of an opportunity… I have not had much of an opportunity to engage with Ideapod yet so would like not to be bombarded with emails and customer reviews just a few days after I joined. Please give me space to use and explore and then I might right a review. Today I have four emails from you. If that continues I will leave

image
very epic
GB

goog 5 stars purely for having the best newsletter signup UI in the game; the people that want to sign up can easily do so after reading a bit of the article and those who don't don't have to deal with popups and can just scroll past. good articles too

image
Jen D coaching
ZA

Thank you for your wisdom Thank you for your wisdom. I look forward to your video messages and emails all the time. They seem to find me just as I need them.

image
Rae Noble Rachel
GB

Used ChatGPT to write articles and make up fictional people and memories. Had an article titled "People who are truly happy usually exhibit these 10 traits" allegedly written by a "Lachlan Brown" a day ago (August 15, 2023) show up in the recommendations on my phone app. When I got to item 7, the item headers started showing that they were interactions between a user giving ChatGPT prompts like "Do the next one. Be counterintuitive." or "Do the last one, with a personal touch." The result was that the anecdotes about characters like "Uncle Rob" were completely fabricated, and Ideapod does not indicate that the articles may be partially fictional. The inclusion of the chat prompts also means that the ChatGPT output for that portion of the article wasn't even edited for quality or accuracy (as accurate as a computer program can be about human habits and personality and emotions), if obvious mistakes like this made it into the published article.

We may use cookies or any other tracking technologies when you visit our website, including any other media form, mobile website, or mobile application related or connected to help customize the Site and improve your experience. learn more

Allow