
Jit
INAwesome! The quality of the lists is great, and the fact that I don't have to signup for an expensive retainer plan makes it a no-brainer for PR pros and entrepreneurs.

Sam J
AUWhen you need a list now, these guys have the goods We needed a list fast for a product launch and Jona delivered instantly. The only reason they didn't get 5 stars is because deliverability wasn't perfect (but it never is) and there were a few avoidable data quality issues (invalid/multiple emails, etc.) as well as a couple of offbeat names (who were happy to tell us so), but it will only improve and the price is right.

Khach
AMNever risk your PR efforts like this I've stumbled upon Jona PR from Product Hunt and at first everything seemed legit, so I decided to give it a try. I've requested 2 lists (from the available list, each costing $39 with ~250 journalists) from jonapr [dot] co They have contacted me in about 2 weeks and asked me to pay $99 to create a custom media list containing 250-350 journalists curated from scratch, and ensuring a 48-72 hour delivery. I was surprised to see that the jump in price from their first email as I expected to get 375 emails for $78 as their website claimed (180+195 emails for 2x39). I was told they transition to a different domain and all the website info is old and such but I found the same pricing on the new website too jonapr [dot] com/pricing and they offer 4 lists for $99 (instead of just 2 in my case). Now their old website says that the list are updated as of October 21, but it seems too obvious that it's not. That should have become a red flag for me at that point, but I decided to proceed with the payment. The next surprise was that the payment itself didn't include payment processing fees so I ended up paying $106. Then they sent me a list of 174 journalists (less than the half) which were somewhat relevant. Then in 6 days they sent me another 100 emails so it began... Imagine receiving an email pitch about innovative pet accessory if you're a journalist covering only photo cameras, lenses or only high-end technological gadgets, like smartphones, smartwatches, etc. Would you be interested? Of course, not. The second list was all about these kind of people. We received a lot of replies for this email campaign, all of them asking us to stop "spamming" them. Some of the emails were also offensive, to say the least. Then I contacted them again to clarify the situation and they promised to send a new compensatory list of 200 contacts for free but that was 28 days ago already and I still haven't received the list yet. To summarize, if you're serious about your project, this is the fastest way to ruin your PR campaign. You'll also end up paying much more than initially requested. Doing the research on your own would be your best bet and if you don't have time, you might want to find someone on Fiverr or similar platforms to do the research for you. Just don't buy ready-made lists as you may experience what I had.

RC
GBMostly accurate contacts, worth the try The list was easy to navigate, and was largely relevant to the sector which we were trying to reach. However, several of the emails turned out to be obsolete, and none of the journalists we contacted reached back out to us.

Jenny Drezin
ILNeeds an accuracy check Many of the contacts were not up to date/accurate because the journalist had already left that publication. So the list was not super useful and we needed to check every entry.