Dan Har
GBJason runs an honest company and has… Jason runs an honest company and has the best of intentions for musicians and curators alike. He clearly prioritizes integrity over making an extra dollar, and that is why his company has the amount of users it now does. Longtime user since 2017 or so, then recently became a curator. Jason and his team are very responsive and honest.
Stefano /
ITbunch of people that never listened… bunch of people that never listened other than pop music maybe, apart for rare cases which someone know what they're talking about ... Maybe they keep low votes for assuring themselves better places on chart!
Joe W
GBI've been using Submithub for the past 3 years I've been using Submithub for the past 3 years and added Groover to my release process within the last year. Both have given me results for roughly the same cost. Submithub (which is very focused on Spotify) has yielded results that I can track to directly streams. However, in terms of broad exposure, Groover wins. Submithub also seems to have a higher bar as far as quality expectations. If your track is not well-polished or has specific technical issues, expect to get some possibly unpleasant feedback. My advice: never ignore negative feedback! Use it to get better at your craft! I will continue to use Submithub in my release process and recommend it to anyone who asks.
CAshton
GBHighly recommended SubmitHub is such a useful website - really great for connecting musicians with curators. Highly recommend to any artists wanting to get their music on more playlists!
OH Overhead
FIArtist-friendly and good platform Submithub currently seems to be the best place to pitch songs, if you're only willing to take the time to find suitable curators. The Submisson fee is probably the cheapest compared to others, although there are other good ones out there. They're also constantly working to improve the platform, which is really great. Keep up the good work!