Ebaby
GBTime saving company valuation google sheet I used the excel from the course which would take me hours to research multiple companies because of the manual entry. My time is very valuable and I rather spend that time researching trading or learning. The ability to do on your phone is awesome. I can get an idea what to invest in and instantly find out the value on the company anywhere. I believe timing is everything in investing and this allows me to do my valuation anywhere. I also enjoy the ratings on the metrics of the company and the ability to edit the score. I made $2000 off one investment in two months using the excel sheet so I already made my money back. This is just of the tools you need to be successful.
Rafat Chaudhry
CAGood Product but doesn’t support all Canadian Stocks This is a very good product for US stocks. Does not cover enough Canadian stocks.
customer
ILThank you for a great instrument! In my opinion, the company's growth data are missing, such as: Revenue, Net income, Equity, FCF and others. Another thing is combinations and graphs. I think there are few graph, it will be great the there will be graphs with combinations of revenue, income from operations, net income, EPS. A combination of revenue and net income. A combination of LT. debt, free cash flow and net income. A combination of assets, liabilities and equity. A combination of operating cash flow, CAPEX and free cash flow. A combination of revenue growth vs. assets growth
Lucian
ROGreat gem! This guy is really selling what he says! I am fully satisfied with the spreadsheet and it's characteristics. Works in seconds like it says and with that you can evaluate lots of companies with the ticker symbol only. Recommended for value investors who want a proffesional opinion before making a decision. Glad I found it!
Charles
GBValue Spreadsheet; Value? Not sure if it is just my stuff or if the spreadsheet needs to be updated. Very few of the stocks I enter come up with accurate data, which I mean is old data. Also, many items come up blank or with error. It just isn't comprehensive enough especially for almost $500. It is a nice concept but I'd have to evaluate the execution as below average.