OK, not amazing The apartment was enormous and the staff very friendly. However, the bedroom windows have no curtains, only office type blinds - so the sun wakes you up at 6am in the summer. The windows are also single glazed so if the sun doesn't wake you up, the bin lorries at 6.30am will! Kitchen crockery was a bit old fashioned and could easily have been much better for not a lot of money.

Great location Great location, walking to a lot of London attractions, very comfortable beds, good space. It could use some update to carpet (maybe hard wood floor), and maybe some charming pictures around. Also the hot water in the bathroom shower was mostly cold.

Poor communication Poor communication, misleading information - I selected my apartment from the LSA website and inquired on details. Email communication was painful - lacking details and repeatedly unanswered specific questions, I finally called from California. Not much better. I finally just stopped asking questions. LSA webpage for the apartment building is grossly misleading - highlighting only the penthouse unit and its features, not the majority of the apartments. LSA never provided any additional information on my specific unit so I assumed the detailed list and photos on their site was applicable to all apartments. So many items were not actually in my apartment such as dishwasher, washer/dryer, hairdryer. The general living space wasn't as displayed in the photos. The listed free wifi never worked, for 12 days, and in fact, no internet is available in the unit - free, paid, wired or otherwise. Very frustrating and difficult to work around. LSA was unsympathetic. I will not work with them again.

Very bad service experience and now out of pocket Firstly I should start by saying the apartment booked was great, as expected and described and I was happy with my experience with London serviced apartments until I arrrived at the apartment. When I arrived the booking had only been made for 2 adults for the whole stay. When I initially made contact with London serviced apartments I detailed that I was looking for a 3 night stay with 2 adults for the first 2 nights and then 4 adults and one child for the third night. I initially requested to book a different apartment to that stayed in and filled in the booking form then detailing 5 adults as they detailed a child as less than 12 years of age, ours is 15. The apartment for which this booking form was filled in was unavailable for one of the nights and therefore London serviced apartments quoted me a price for an alternative apartment, they did this knowing there would be 5 individuals and 5 adults under their criteria at this point, I then filled in another booking form detailing 5 adults again and the apartment was booked. On arriving at the apartment they informed me the booking by London serviced apartments had only been made for 2 adults for the whole stay!!! I was then informed I was required to pay additional monies for the third night for the 5th adult for a sofa bed to be made up. I contacted London service apartments and they took absolutely no responsibility, continually blaming me for the fact that I initially put that the 5th individual was a child in the initial request. She is a child, just not by their criteria. Despite this, and despite the fact that they have 2 booking forms detailing 5 adults they clearly quoted me incorrectly and misinformed me. Whether the child was classed as a child or adult the apartments informed me as an additional sofa bed needed to be made up I would have had to have paid anyway. On that basis London serviced apartments argument is completely flawed as I informed there was 5 people from my first initial contact. They will take no ownership or responsibility for their error and I found them to be completely unreasonable. They only had to accept the mistake and cover the cost but instead I am out of pocket. Very disappointing and I would not recommend using them on this basis. I won’t be using them again.

Dated accommodation Kitchen was useless, shower weak, and overall upkeep was poor