Roby
AUMust-have tool for travellers who want to save extra $$ on trips A must-have tool for travellers who want to save extra $$ on trips. Not annoying, pops up only when I am browsing for hotels. Recently discovered emojis which show hotel ratings on different websites and I love it - nice touch Ratepunk!
Gzegoz Zablockij
LTI've been using ratepunk for more than… I've been using ratepunk for more than a year now. Always checking prices before booking a hotel or any other accommodation. Great and simplified comparison. Getting me saved at least 10-15% of initial price.
aivaras grisius
LTEasy to install plugin and saved 60 EUR… Easy to install plugin and saved 60 EUR for 2 nights in Amsterdam in a matter of few clicks
Bogdan V.
ROworth the money the add-on for the browser can save you some money and the prices shown by location can get you some savings as well if you use a VPN. Only this free add-on worth some money if you travel 2-3 times per year. I subscribed recently to the premium version 12$/year and they have some sections for travel hackers where you set the airport and will get some offers. Looks good so far! Support would need to get better as they are not so responsive but let's hope for the best.
Lukas Inokaitis
LTNot worth the premium subscription. I installed the browser extension in November 2023. I made seven new bookings via booking.com, and they only track one booking. UX/UI is so bad that it's hard to include your bookings, or the extension does not show up when you book. They notified me once that I could save 40% on my one booking, but when I booked, the price was EUR 1,100 and when they informed me the price was EUR 1,500…. I sent them an email and they said that it's a bug. So, it is not worth subscribing to their paid version if they can't make the product work on their main advertised functionality. Plus, if you would like to save money on the booking, you need to cancel the booking and then do it again yourself. They just send you the notification that the rate dropped (which they also got wrong).