Looks too good to be true for a reason I got rejected after the Basic Fit stage consisted of 5 or so questions to which I responded positively. It left me with a strange feeling so I decided to go on Trustpilot to see what other people think. And sure enough -- looks like Crossover is some kind of data harvesting, clickbait project. The fact that you can't just delete your profile seems to prove it. What a waste of time.

Crossover mission This company has a mission of providing remote work opportunities worldwide. They take care of management, payments, trainings, onboardings. They offer very good rates. Selection process is challenging, but I really don't understand how you can blame anybody based on that.

Poor choice for employer branding and reputation Awful experience. Spent 3 hours, qualifying positively across 5 stages for a job application. 5 mins after I completed after those 3 hours, I was declined and the autoresponder shared that I was not a fit for the role. A huge waste of candidate's time, and a poor reflection on employers. Never use this as an employer.

This is trash. This is trash. You spend hours doing assignments and then don't even receive a reply in the end. Even if someone turned in a better job than me, I expect to be contacted in a personalized manner, after dedicating multiple hours and giving ideas to a company.

AI in HR instead of Human Reviews? You be the judge! I would say the application process is fairly streamlined and straightforward. Yes, there are tests and practicals to complete, but if you think the job is right for you, why complain? Where I do want to voice a concern is in the review and response category. I got a response after only a couple of hours of completing my final practical exercise telling me I was not selected to move forward for the position I applied for. Yes, a bit of a heart-smasher, but what bothers me is the turnaround time being so fast. This tells me that there is likely not a human reviewing applications even at this stage and that you are being vetted by their in-house (or external!) AI system. If I'm wrong here, please respond. If I am right, I can see how a lot of talented candidates are falling through the cracks, which is a shame. What I would offer is this: IF the applications are being vetted automatically by your HR-AI, THEN I would suggest training the AI to also give applicants constructive feedback on where they erred in their applications, to better improve the chances of repeat applications making it through to next steps in the process.