Alexander Stefurishin
RUCrossover mission This company has a mission of providing remote work opportunities worldwide. They take care of management, payments, trainings, onboardings. They offer very good rates. Selection process is challenging, but I really don't understand how you can blame anybody based on that.
Jaime
GBDodgy site to get free work done from prospective employees It feels like this is a fake site, set up to gather free users ideas and data. Similar to other reviews, I sat for hours on end doing spurious tests, until I was subjected to the real work assessment. I then spent several more hours doing a virtual, in depth product customer discovery session. Once I completed that, crossover went absolutely silent and ended up closing the job posting and giving me 0 feedback. Won't make the same mistake again
Pamplemousse
IEDynamic and Rewarding Remote Role I've found my experience to be both challenging and rewarding. Working remotely for 40 hours a week, I've been able to balance my professional and personal life effectively. The job has met and surpassed my expectations in several ways. The flexibility of remote work, combined with a supportive team and management, has been a pleasant surprise. The pay is competitive and certainly more attractive than many local job options. The hiring procedure is thorough, which might be overwhelming for some candidates.
Wherehaveallthecowgirlsgone
GBAI in HR instead of Human Reviews? You be the judge! I would say the application process is fairly streamlined and straightforward. Yes, there are tests and practicals to complete, but if you think the job is right for you, why complain? Where I do want to voice a concern is in the review and response category. I got a response after only a couple of hours of completing my final practical exercise telling me I was not selected to move forward for the position I applied for. Yes, a bit of a heart-smasher, but what bothers me is the turnaround time being so fast. This tells me that there is likely not a human reviewing applications even at this stage and that you are being vetted by their in-house (or external!) AI system. If I'm wrong here, please respond. If I am right, I can see how a lot of talented candidates are falling through the cracks, which is a shame. What I would offer is this: IF the applications are being vetted automatically by your HR-AI, THEN I would suggest training the AI to also give applicants constructive feedback on where they erred in their applications, to better improve the chances of repeat applications making it through to next steps in the process.
Aboo AJC
INCrossover - Top 1% talent from around the world I was selected by Crossover last year and I have been working there since. I failed the test once and got selected on my second try. There is very less job security because you are competing with the top 1% best talent in the world. Just because you were not selected does not mean the company is not legit. If you gave up means you could have never made it through training in this company. I love working there because it challenges me to give my best every day I log in to work. I look forward to excelling in the current role and try for the next level. There is no consideration that you work there when applying for another role. Everyone has a fair chance at being selected. I hope to work there until my contract lasts.