Brenda Lee
CAPoor choice for employer branding and reputation Awful experience. Spent 3 hours, qualifying positively across 5 stages for a job application. 5 mins after I completed after those 3 hours, I was declined and the autoresponder shared that I was not a fit for the role. A huge waste of candidate's time, and a poor reflection on employers. Never use this as an employer.
marc
NLBe suspicious Not having heard before about Crossover I just went into the application process for a VP marketing role completely blank. Sure enough I passed the basic fit, CATT and English language test. But then thing did start to become weird. I had to do a so-called "real work" test. For this I had to write some marketing copy. There were some criteria which you are told about in advance , so I made sure I did hit all of them in my content piece. After I submitted it, I had to wait for over a week to get a message that I only had gotten 1 out of the 3 stars required and my application was rejected for that reason. However, when I checked the document history I could see nobody had looked at it. I just got a bad rating out of nowhere. This feels quite scammy and looking back I guess it all has been a waste of time.
Mathew Davis
FRLearning in high Optempo I have learned so much working for this company and really love their data based conclusions. I have worked for other organizations where decisions were taken on a whim and this company has a clear direction. The Optempo is very high which can be stressful but the pay, fully remote position, time flexibility, and professional development make it worth it.
Matthew Prior
CHI'm cross; it's over Like scores of others here, I wasted time and care on Crossover's Mickey Mouse testing for no job. I don't know what their real game is - feeding testing data to an AI, perhaps - but their standards are suspiciously impossible to satisfy.
Maxx Velocity
GBTheir tests are a failure I'm literally a certified genius, so to tell me I didn't pass their "cognitive test" just means they don't know how cognitive tests work. In short: almost the entire test is numerical math problems, the kind no one actually ever does in real life. Yes there were some actual cognition questions, but very few. Just math, math, and more math. I have a disability related to reading numbers, but again, I am a certified freakin' genius and reading numbers has nothing to do with critical thinking. Nothing. This is just one more example of how millenials are not the right people to be running things. Maybe some day they will shut up and listen to those of us who created the tech industry, but it's not looking good.