Elf_23
ITVery bad experience with Crossover Very bad experience with Crossover. As an established professional, I took the time to take five unpaid (!) tests for a Copywriter position. The last test was quite time consuming. My work has been in “review” for days. No update. I contact their “AI”, which tells me that the position is “on hold”. I ask to create a ticket. I get the same answer from an “agent”, literally. Very, very poor experience, considering the amount of time I put in the tests. Allow me: it seems to me that you are very picky with the candidates but that you don’t live up to your own expectations. A “human” update indicating I have wasted five hours of my time would be the minimum. Oh! And the fact that you use AI doesn’t make me a SH (stupid human): I know when AI is answering pretending to be “James”.
Chris Hornby
GBExcellent pay and transparent (if… Excellent pay and transparent (if tough) requirements. The CCAT and hiring pipeline is hard: but it is real and is not a scam. It's hard because Crossover is looking for the very best talent out there. There are literally thousands of applicants a day because the pay is so high.
Brenda Lee
CAPoor choice for employer branding and reputation Awful experience. Spent 3 hours, qualifying positively across 5 stages for a job application. 5 mins after I completed after those 3 hours, I was declined and the autoresponder shared that I was not a fit for the role. A huge waste of candidate's time, and a poor reflection on employers. Never use this as an employer.
C M
GBAvoid at all costs Avoid at all costs. I would never want to work for a company who uses this awful tool to hire for a position.
Matthew Prior
CHI'm cross; it's over Like scores of others here, I wasted time and care on Crossover's Mickey Mouse testing for no job. I don't know what their real game is - feeding testing data to an AI, perhaps - but their standards are suspiciously impossible to satisfy.