Jaime
GBDodgy site to get free work done from prospective employees It feels like this is a fake site, set up to gather free users ideas and data. Similar to other reviews, I sat for hours on end doing spurious tests, until I was subjected to the real work assessment. I then spent several more hours doing a virtual, in depth product customer discovery session. Once I completed that, crossover went absolutely silent and ended up closing the job posting and giving me 0 feedback. Won't make the same mistake again
Chris Hornby
GBExcellent pay and transparent (if… Excellent pay and transparent (if tough) requirements. The CCAT and hiring pipeline is hard: but it is real and is not a scam. It's hard because Crossover is looking for the very best talent out there. There are literally thousands of applicants a day because the pay is so high.
Zeeshan Ahmad
AEA great opportunity to explore the… A great opportunity to explore the world while sitting in your own work place and to experience working with multinational teams to polish your skills. Allowing me to grow and learn at my own pace with gentle push to move forward.
Elf_23
ITVery bad experience with Crossover Very bad experience with Crossover. As an established professional, I took the time to take five unpaid (!) tests for a Copywriter position. The last test was quite time consuming. My work has been in “review” for days. No update. I contact their “AI”, which tells me that the position is “on hold”. I ask to create a ticket. I get the same answer from an “agent”, literally. Very, very poor experience, considering the amount of time I put in the tests. Allow me: it seems to me that you are very picky with the candidates but that you don’t live up to your own expectations. A “human” update indicating I have wasted five hours of my time would be the minimum. Oh! And the fact that you use AI doesn’t make me a SH (stupid human): I know when AI is answering pretending to be “James”.
Wherehaveallthecowgirlsgone
GBAI in HR instead of Human Reviews? You be the judge! I would say the application process is fairly streamlined and straightforward. Yes, there are tests and practicals to complete, but if you think the job is right for you, why complain? Where I do want to voice a concern is in the review and response category. I got a response after only a couple of hours of completing my final practical exercise telling me I was not selected to move forward for the position I applied for. Yes, a bit of a heart-smasher, but what bothers me is the turnaround time being so fast. This tells me that there is likely not a human reviewing applications even at this stage and that you are being vetted by their in-house (or external!) AI system. If I'm wrong here, please respond. If I am right, I can see how a lot of talented candidates are falling through the cracks, which is a shame. What I would offer is this: IF the applications are being vetted automatically by your HR-AI, THEN I would suggest training the AI to also give applicants constructive feedback on where they erred in their applications, to better improve the chances of repeat applications making it through to next steps in the process.