Their tests are a failure I'm literally a certified genius, so to tell me I didn't pass their "cognitive test" just means they don't know how cognitive tests work. In short: almost the entire test is numerical math problems, the kind no one actually ever does in real life. Yes there were some actual cognition questions, but very few. Just math, math, and more math. I have a disability related to reading numbers, but again, I am a certified freakin' genius and reading numbers has nothing to do with critical thinking. Nothing. This is just one more example of how millenials are not the right people to be running things. Maybe some day they will shut up and listen to those of us who created the tech industry, but it's not looking good.

Looks too good to be true for a reason I got rejected after the Basic Fit stage consisted of 5 or so questions to which I responded positively. It left me with a strange feeling so I decided to go on Trustpilot to see what other people think. And sure enough -- looks like Crossover is some kind of data harvesting, clickbait project. The fact that you can't just delete your profile seems to prove it. What a waste of time.

Excellent pay and transparent (if… Excellent pay and transparent (if tough) requirements. The CCAT and hiring pipeline is hard: but it is real and is not a scam. It's hard because Crossover is looking for the very best talent out there. There are literally thousands of applicants a day because the pay is so high.

I'm cross; it's over Like scores of others here, I wasted time and care on Crossover's Mickey Mouse testing for no job. I don't know what their real game is - feeding testing data to an AI, perhaps - but their standards are suspiciously impossible to satisfy.

AI in HR instead of Human Reviews? You be the judge! I would say the application process is fairly streamlined and straightforward. Yes, there are tests and practicals to complete, but if you think the job is right for you, why complain? Where I do want to voice a concern is in the review and response category. I got a response after only a couple of hours of completing my final practical exercise telling me I was not selected to move forward for the position I applied for. Yes, a bit of a heart-smasher, but what bothers me is the turnaround time being so fast. This tells me that there is likely not a human reviewing applications even at this stage and that you are being vetted by their in-house (or external!) AI system. If I'm wrong here, please respond. If I am right, I can see how a lot of talented candidates are falling through the cracks, which is a shame. What I would offer is this: IF the applications are being vetted automatically by your HR-AI, THEN I would suggest training the AI to also give applicants constructive feedback on where they erred in their applications, to better improve the chances of repeat applications making it through to next steps in the process.