AI in HR instead of Human Reviews? You be the judge! I would say the application process is fairly streamlined and straightforward. Yes, there are tests and practicals to complete, but if you think the job is right for you, why complain? Where I do want to voice a concern is in the review and response category. I got a response after only a couple of hours of completing my final practical exercise telling me I was not selected to move forward for the position I applied for. Yes, a bit of a heart-smasher, but what bothers me is the turnaround time being so fast. This tells me that there is likely not a human reviewing applications even at this stage and that you are being vetted by their in-house (or external!) AI system. If I'm wrong here, please respond. If I am right, I can see how a lot of talented candidates are falling through the cracks, which is a shame. What I would offer is this: IF the applications are being vetted automatically by your HR-AI, THEN I would suggest training the AI to also give applicants constructive feedback on where they erred in their applications, to better improve the chances of repeat applications making it through to next steps in the process.

I'm cross; it's over Like scores of others here, I wasted time and care on Crossover's Mickey Mouse testing for no job. I don't know what their real game is - feeding testing data to an AI, perhaps - but their standards are suspiciously impossible to satisfy.

Their tests are a failure I'm literally a certified genius, so to tell me I didn't pass their "cognitive test" just means they don't know how cognitive tests work. In short: almost the entire test is numerical math problems, the kind no one actually ever does in real life. Yes there were some actual cognition questions, but very few. Just math, math, and more math. I have a disability related to reading numbers, but again, I am a certified freakin' genius and reading numbers has nothing to do with critical thinking. Nothing. This is just one more example of how millenials are not the right people to be running things. Maybe some day they will shut up and listen to those of us who created the tech industry, but it's not looking good.

Crossover - Top 1% talent from around the world I was selected by Crossover last year and I have been working there since. I failed the test once and got selected on my second try. There is very less job security because you are competing with the top 1% best talent in the world. Just because you were not selected does not mean the company is not legit. If you gave up means you could have never made it through training in this company. I love working there because it challenges me to give my best every day I log in to work. I look forward to excelling in the current role and try for the next level. There is no consideration that you work there when applying for another role. Everyone has a fair chance at being selected. I hope to work there until my contract lasts.

Very bad experience with Crossover Very bad experience with Crossover. As an established professional, I took the time to take five unpaid (!) tests for a Copywriter position. The last test was quite time consuming. My work has been in “review” for days. No update. I contact their “AI”, which tells me that the position is “on hold”. I ask to create a ticket. I get the same answer from an “agent”, literally. Very, very poor experience, considering the amount of time I put in the tests. Allow me: it seems to me that you are very picky with the candidates but that you don’t live up to your own expectations. A “human” update indicating I have wasted five hours of my time would be the minimum. Oh! And the fact that you use AI doesn’t make me a SH (stupid human): I know when AI is answering pretending to be “James”.