Ramses
NLThey removed our production VPS because⦠They removed our production VPS because the credits balance was too low. I did not receive any notices in my mailbox or anywhere else. All I found was their newsletters. I was paying for snapshots in case anything would happen to the VPS and the data. Though this snapshot also got deleted. After that I tried to refund the remaining credits still on the account but this was also not possible. Lost lots of time and money on this. Do Not Use.
Team Cyberin
INNon existence support Nonexistent support: it's as if someone created an application and abandoned it on autopilot. Or perhaps someone developed this application but doesn't have time to manage their passion project. Cloudcone is just like that: VPS servers on shared resources with absolutely no support. Good luck.
Manyabg
HKA review of cloudcone I know this VPS provider through a famous VPS test website 91yun and I set up VPS here mostly because they are providing a free credit of 5 dollars then . I used the VPS for private proxy So I chose the least resources and deploy an VPS The most amazing feature which draw my interest is that they calculate bill by hour just like vultr and it's data center is qoudcone which I am not familiar . However , it provide a high quality connection from China mainland to Los Angeles which is almost the same of QN data center The only thing I think need to improve is that it's uplink port is only 100 Mbps I will be very glad if it promotes to Gbps port or even 10 Gbps uplink port.
sebastian
CLGreat service. I have been using the email hosting service for about a month now, some email reached the spam folder of a recipient, but that is not necessarily the fault of the service provider. I really like the user interface they have, they use SOGo as a webmail client, and the interface is also nice and it is a functional client. The price is quite affordable. I do not have any record of having lost an email. It is an excellent service.
Judd West
AUGood price, not so good performance. Whilst server setup and provisioning was relatively quick, and the pricing is competitive, I found the SSH rather unresponsive, and upon further testing, the disk IOPS are all over the place, with the VPS becoming unresponsive at times. Furthermore, the images provided for deployment are outdated, with Ubuntu only being as recent as 18.04, and Arch being an image from 2018 (which meant I had to fight with GPG to upgrade the system to the latest packages) I used my VPS for a total of 27 minutes before giving up. I've had instances ready to go with my docker stack within an hour on Vultr and even DigitalOcean, but this host was still stuck halfway updating the OS before I quit. The tic-tac-toe game when provisioning is a nice touch, but it'd be nicer if the servers performed better.