Jacek Dabert
PLWordvice - a team worth recommending I have used Wordvice's services four times and each time I have been very satisfied with the quality of the work done. The editors are knowledgeable, their comments very helpful, and the turnaround time and prices are satisfactory. I plan to continue sending manuscripts for proofreading with this team.
Naman Bansal
ZAGood work I got my edit earlier than expected and it was edited thoroughly by Sadhna . But I would like to mention here that I referred my fried Sanjay Gupta and he sent his common app essay for edit but the edit he got was very bad and when complained wordvice asked him to order another edit which is paying double for single service.
Jeysson Sanchez-Suarez
COGood service at a reasonable price Good service at a reasonable price I used a proofreading service from a big famous company before. Now, if I compare the results obtained from Wordvice with that big famous company, I can pretty sure that I'm going to continue using Wordvice. The paper clearly showed an improved version. The editor performed very careful and detailed work, even, it did crucially points of view that helped me to do my work more technical and professional. Finally, the results were delivered at the time (according to the contracted service) and they offered the possibility to do feedback if I'd considered it necessary. I'm very satisfied with the results.
M. V. V. M.
ESWe are extremely happy with your work We are extremely happy with your work. It excels and improves the quality of the document. However, we have tried to contact you regarding the final price of your work. When we visited your webpage, the budget included a 50 dollars’ discount, which was not available at the time of uploading the document. We would be very grateful if you could apply the discount. Above all, thank you very much for your help!
customer
AUThey actually introduced a lot of… They actually introduced a lot of mistakes, missed errors or often just reworded things. For example it was clear that the whole section had to be written gender neutral instead the editor (Sarah B) assumed a random gender and revised it all. Probably will look somewhere else to see if I find a better service.