If you like using Bing, you'll love Unicheck. Otherwise... Bunch of things. For starters, with a Personal account you can't do Side-by-Side comparisons. Fine, fair enough. But then when I took a close look at the report turns out it missed over 50% of the items that were copied directly from a wide variety of business news sites. For each of them, pasting the text into Google brought up the page in the first result. When I enquired with customer support, the explanation was: "Our system uses Bing search engine, unfortunately some texts are indexed in the Google only". Um, ok. Yeah. I think that pretty much says it all. When I asked about a refund I was told: "Our service is non-refundable. It’s stated in our customer agreement which you had opportunity to read and agreed while creating an account." Guess I missed the part about their reliance on the Bing search engine. Use at your own risk. UPDATE: After saying goodbye to my $10, I tried the same doc again on Scribbr. Yes, it cost $20. That's why I went with Unicheck in the first place. But let's just say you get what you paid for. Scribber found at least 2x as many items that were copied from websites. Also, I went for it because, unlike Unicheck, they had a 100% Happiness Refund guarantee. So there you go. Good luck.

At the beginning Customer service was great, however it became horrible First of all i asked a question regarding a problem. The explained it to me very clear, however the instruction i followed didn't help solve the problem. When i told the customer service lady that. She didn't reply. I waited for over an hour. no reply. I did not like the quality of there customer service.

Probably Great, If All of Your Sources Are Websites Hey, this service is probably great, if all of your sources are websites. Since you can't try out the service before sinking money into it, you will spend some to find out whether it works for you. For me, it miss-identified a basic McLuhan citation, and failed to recognize any in text citations from book sources in the Chicago Full-Note format. It even suggested, the title of an in-text citation to be plagiarism. The thing is, with a limited number of pricey tries, the amount of iterations to figure out how to get a decent result should not be put on the user! Particularly, with plagiarism testing, the tool should hopefully over-and not underreport, but by not recognizing any book publication prior to 2010, this seems like a big risk. It honestly seems like you are paying for a very baseline service, a sort of feelgood expenditure. While the support responded quickly and kindly, apparently not providing refunds is part of their business model. I am genuinely curious why this software has so many good reviews here. Edit: I just read some more reviews, and I am not sure why, but most of them are one- or two-liners from the 20th to the 30th May 2020. That is a little odd, and maybe presents something for Trustpilot to look into.

Helpful This is a lifesaver for my master thesis. The option to directly visit the website that has been marked as "similar" is really useful for me. Also, I love that it subtracts citations from similarity percentages. All in all great app.

Great plagiarism checker! Great plagiarism checker! I have been using the free version of Unicheck for about 4 months and have loved how accurate it has been. You get to check 500 words each time and I think 4-5 times before it cuts you off and offers you to upgrade. You can choose to purchase one of their options or wait 2 - 3 hours before you can use the free version again. I just saw that there is an option to buy the individual version and you can choose the amount of pages you will actually use. The first option is 20 pages for $5 which isn't too bad. I'm thinking about how many pages I actually want to buy. I think 100 pages for $15 is a great deal so I think that'll be the one I go with.