
Ain Haruto
AUAt the beginning Customer service was great, however it became horrible First of all i asked a question regarding a problem. The explained it to me very clear, however the instruction i followed didn't help solve the problem. When i told the customer service lady that. She didn't reply. I waited for over an hour. no reply. I did not like the quality of there customer service.

David W
DEProbably Great, If All of Your Sources Are Websites Hey, this service is probably great, if all of your sources are websites. Since you can't try out the service before sinking money into it, you will spend some to find out whether it works for you. For me, it miss-identified a basic McLuhan citation, and failed to recognize any in text citations from book sources in the Chicago Full-Note format. It even suggested, the title of an in-text citation to be plagiarism. The thing is, with a limited number of pricey tries, the amount of iterations to figure out how to get a decent result should not be put on the user! Particularly, with plagiarism testing, the tool should hopefully over-and not underreport, but by not recognizing any book publication prior to 2010, this seems like a big risk. It honestly seems like you are paying for a very baseline service, a sort of feelgood expenditure. While the support responded quickly and kindly, apparently not providing refunds is part of their business model. I am genuinely curious why this software has so many good reviews here. Edit: I just read some more reviews, and I am not sure why, but most of them are one- or two-liners from the 20th to the 30th May 2020. That is a little odd, and maybe presents something for Trustpilot to look into.

Resource Drive Team
NGI won't recommend this checker This plagiarism checker is not efficient, at least for me. Because why will it rate my assignment with a 1% similarity score and then my school runs it on turnitin and it churns up 35% based on comparison with internet sources. Unicheck just isn't doing well.

Michael Letsinger
GBI pay for this service as a student I pay for this service as a student. Numerous times it ignores my footnotes/citations and still reports my text as plagiarized. This is a huge problem. Second, the service does not recognize references although it shows a category for references This web service is taken as gospel by universities yet has issues that create problems for students.

Arthur
UAQueues Queues too long for a paid service, sometimes can go up to an hour which is horrid compared to other paid and even free plagiarism-checkers. Also doesnt accept direct credit card payments, only PayPal. Helpful and fast support team, though.