Waste of money Waste of money. Doesn't detect anything. Of course they don't tell you they only check against open access sources in advance. No refund either for doing nothing.

Very Good tool for regular plagiarism… Very Good tool for regular plagiarism checking, almost using it for 2 years now, money paid is worth it and i would recommend them to others. Their customer support is also great and very helpful whenever there are any issues. Kudos to the Unicheck team!

Best plagiarism checker Honestly, Unicheck is the best so far . I’ve been on the site not more than 24 hours but Due it’s efficiency in scanning works for plagiarism I rate this checker 100% and recommend anyone be it a professional or co worker to enroll in order to have a better experience of unicheck. Thank you once again

Unicheck is the greatest system I have… Unicheck is the greatest system I have used so far. Convenient and effective. Always shows the detailed analysis. Love this about it. I really recommend using these app to find out "the hidden truth". Saved me a few times. Thank you, UniCheck!

Probably Great, If All of Your Sources Are Websites Hey, this service is probably great, if all of your sources are websites. Since you can't try out the service before sinking money into it, you will spend some to find out whether it works for you. For me, it miss-identified a basic McLuhan citation, and failed to recognize any in text citations from book sources in the Chicago Full-Note format. It even suggested, the title of an in-text citation to be plagiarism. The thing is, with a limited number of pricey tries, the amount of iterations to figure out how to get a decent result should not be put on the user! Particularly, with plagiarism testing, the tool should hopefully over-and not underreport, but by not recognizing any book publication prior to 2010, this seems like a big risk. It honestly seems like you are paying for a very baseline service, a sort of feelgood expenditure. While the support responded quickly and kindly, apparently not providing refunds is part of their business model. I am genuinely curious why this software has so many good reviews here. Edit: I just read some more reviews, and I am not sure why, but most of them are one- or two-liners from the 20th to the 30th May 2020. That is a little odd, and maybe presents something for Trustpilot to look into.