Excellent program for checking plagiarism Very useful for students, who want to check their papers for plagiarism. The peculiarity of the site is that it does not count random coincidence in two words as plagiarism, which saves a lot of time and nerves. Also, prices are quite affordable for students.

Great plagiarism checker! Great plagiarism checker! I have been using the free version of Unicheck for about 4 months and have loved how accurate it has been. You get to check 500 words each time and I think 4-5 times before it cuts you off and offers you to upgrade. You can choose to purchase one of their options or wait 2 - 3 hours before you can use the free version again. I just saw that there is an option to buy the individual version and you can choose the amount of pages you will actually use. The first option is 20 pages for $5 which isn't too bad. I'm thinking about how many pages I actually want to buy. I think 100 pages for $15 is a great deal so I think that'll be the one I go with.

Unicheck is the greatest system I have… Unicheck is the greatest system I have used so far. Convenient and effective. Always shows the detailed analysis. Love this about it. I really recommend using these app to find out "the hidden truth". Saved me a few times. Thank you, UniCheck!

I won't recommend this checker This plagiarism checker is not efficient, at least for me. Because why will it rate my assignment with a 1% similarity score and then my school runs it on turnitin and it churns up 35% based on comparison with internet sources. Unicheck just isn't doing well.

Probably Great, If All of Your Sources Are Websites Hey, this service is probably great, if all of your sources are websites. Since you can't try out the service before sinking money into it, you will spend some to find out whether it works for you. For me, it miss-identified a basic McLuhan citation, and failed to recognize any in text citations from book sources in the Chicago Full-Note format. It even suggested, the title of an in-text citation to be plagiarism. The thing is, with a limited number of pricey tries, the amount of iterations to figure out how to get a decent result should not be put on the user! Particularly, with plagiarism testing, the tool should hopefully over-and not underreport, but by not recognizing any book publication prior to 2010, this seems like a big risk. It honestly seems like you are paying for a very baseline service, a sort of feelgood expenditure. While the support responded quickly and kindly, apparently not providing refunds is part of their business model. I am genuinely curious why this software has so many good reviews here. Edit: I just read some more reviews, and I am not sure why, but most of them are one- or two-liners from the 20th to the 30th May 2020. That is a little odd, and maybe presents something for Trustpilot to look into.