scam website..states plagiarism where… scam website..states plagiarism where there is none! Just makes students anxious...Rather trust Turnitin similarity report at your own uni...or free plagiarism software...!!! Makes me really angry...Students are SO stressed and then get discouraged right at the end of their assignment by scam websites like this one!!!! DO NOT USE..for your own mental health and peace of mind!

Unsatisfactory business practices Unsatisfactory business practices. They impose a time limit on the pages you buy, which reflects poorly on their customer service. Once you've utilised the service, the cost seems inconsequential to them. It feels as if they've taken my money without fair value in return.

I pay for this service as a student I pay for this service as a student. Numerous times it ignores my footnotes/citations and still reports my text as plagiarized. This is a huge problem. Second, the service does not recognize references although it shows a category for references This web service is taken as gospel by universities yet has issues that create problems for students.

Probably Great, If All of Your Sources Are Websites Hey, this service is probably great, if all of your sources are websites. Since you can't try out the service before sinking money into it, you will spend some to find out whether it works for you. For me, it miss-identified a basic McLuhan citation, and failed to recognize any in text citations from book sources in the Chicago Full-Note format. It even suggested, the title of an in-text citation to be plagiarism. The thing is, with a limited number of pricey tries, the amount of iterations to figure out how to get a decent result should not be put on the user! Particularly, with plagiarism testing, the tool should hopefully over-and not underreport, but by not recognizing any book publication prior to 2010, this seems like a big risk. It honestly seems like you are paying for a very baseline service, a sort of feelgood expenditure. While the support responded quickly and kindly, apparently not providing refunds is part of their business model. I am genuinely curious why this software has so many good reviews here. Edit: I just read some more reviews, and I am not sure why, but most of them are one- or two-liners from the 20th to the 30th May 2020. That is a little odd, and maybe presents something for Trustpilot to look into.

Queues Queues too long for a paid service, sometimes can go up to an hour which is horrid compared to other paid and even free plagiarism-checkers. Also doesnt accept direct credit card payments, only PayPal. Helpful and fast support team, though.