Waste of money Waste of money. Doesn't detect anything. Of course they don't tell you they only check against open access sources in advance. No refund either for doing nothing.

Queues Queues too long for a paid service, sometimes can go up to an hour which is horrid compared to other paid and even free plagiarism-checkers. Also doesnt accept direct credit card payments, only PayPal. Helpful and fast support team, though.

Unsatisfactory business practices Unsatisfactory business practices. They impose a time limit on the pages you buy, which reflects poorly on their customer service. Once you've utilised the service, the cost seems inconsequential to them. It feels as if they've taken my money without fair value in return.

I won't recommend this checker This plagiarism checker is not efficient, at least for me. Because why will it rate my assignment with a 1% similarity score and then my school runs it on turnitin and it churns up 35% based on comparison with internet sources. Unicheck just isn't doing well.

Probably Great, If All of Your Sources Are Websites Hey, this service is probably great, if all of your sources are websites. Since you can't try out the service before sinking money into it, you will spend some to find out whether it works for you. For me, it miss-identified a basic McLuhan citation, and failed to recognize any in text citations from book sources in the Chicago Full-Note format. It even suggested, the title of an in-text citation to be plagiarism. The thing is, with a limited number of pricey tries, the amount of iterations to figure out how to get a decent result should not be put on the user! Particularly, with plagiarism testing, the tool should hopefully over-and not underreport, but by not recognizing any book publication prior to 2010, this seems like a big risk. It honestly seems like you are paying for a very baseline service, a sort of feelgood expenditure. While the support responded quickly and kindly, apparently not providing refunds is part of their business model. I am genuinely curious why this software has so many good reviews here. Edit: I just read some more reviews, and I am not sure why, but most of them are one- or two-liners from the 20th to the 30th May 2020. That is a little odd, and maybe presents something for Trustpilot to look into.