Walter Bayles
AUWarranty Waste of Money Bought a Panasonic Lumix ts3 in Jan 2012 used it a couple of times diving was OK , went snorkeling on the barrier reef and noticed moisture in the lense. Contacted "Mackcam" told me to send to an approved repairer, come back "USER ERROR" . they would not cover the damage. Camera is now scrap after only 3 months, panasonic Australia will not repair as it is imported. Wrote to "CITIWIDE" about purchasing a replacment ........ no reply. When you purchase from them you have no choice as to the MACKCAM warranty, it is a given. I have since found it is cheaper to buy in Australia as the warranty is in the price of the item. I
Nicolas Domingue
HKGreat customer service Great customer service, fast shipping. Got product with well packed. really fast in Europe.
van
FRRude sellers and defectuous items Do not buy from this company from ebay!! I bought an Seiko Alpinist from them and it kept dying after 7 hours at rest. This seller sent me a defectuous watch and they will do anything to refuse my return and they won't refund me. He didn't even answered to my messages. Do not repeat my mistake , avoid this seller.
Dan Warne
AUSold me on free DHL Express Courier delivery then sent by post! I bought from Citiwide Online and free DHL Express delivery was offered on the auction. I bought it based on this as I needed the item quickly. Then they sent a "DHL" tracking number that DHL didn't recognise. When I queried it they said it was a postal tracking number, not DHL. I asked them to refund the difference in what it would have cost them to send via DHL instead of post, and their answer was "there is not extra cost charge for the DHL service". What weasels... since they don't charge extra for express international courier, they don't have to refund anything if they don't provide it? I don't think so! I'll be opening a formal eBay dispute.
christine martin
AUWorst company ever I had my warranty refused and I would have been very surprised if they honoured it because it was a bit sus when every reply I received had if the camera is found to be human error it will not be covered they seemed to overstate this continously. The camera has never been near water and they have classed it as water damage. Believe me this will not be the last they hear of me I am going to pursue this to the very end they are not going to get away with it as I can see from other posts they have done this regularly.