do not buy The App never allowed me to Log in. do not buy

nayden RED FLAG 🚩 The application is only money oriented and the customer support is incredibly terrible. It says on the website that a refund can be made within 30 days, but they do not respond to e-mails. They tell you nonsense and irrelevant topics again. In short, I was defrauded and I did not receive a refund etc.. Do not buy the application, you will not be able to contact anyone. They don't even deserve 1 star!

It's not worth the hype! I was excited to purchase and use this app thinking AI would have it all planned out. However, it's the opposite. This app has multiple glitches and does not plan out your workouts accordingly. I'm in a FB Zing group and there are so many others with the same complaint. I had the app for almost two weeks and going to cancel! I believe it's a 30-day guaranteed refund! Until Zing fixes the glitches, I recommend using another app!

Fraudulent I bought one week membership for 6£ without renewal but right now I received notification from my app payment that this company are trying to take 38£ without my consent. Guys please make sure don’t put your details on This app wich also can’t give you a good plan. Very disappointed with this app

Overpriced and Underperforming: A Disappointing User Experience Zing has a promising concept, aiming to help users achieve their fitness goals. However, despite its potential, the app falls short in delivering value, especially considering its high price point. One of the most glaring omissions is the lack of a basic feature like a buzzer or sound notification when the rest timer is up. This oversight can easily lead to users losing track of their rest periods, disrupting their workout flow and potentially compromising their progress. Furthermore, the app does not allow users to input crucial workout data such as the number of reps, sets, and weight achieved. This inability to track and monitor progress is a significant drawback, as it hinders users from assessing their performance and making informed adjustments to their fitness routines. Another disappointment is the app's limited exercise library. Users with specific exercise equipment may find that their options are not even included, rendering their investments in such equipment futile. The app should provide a comprehensive range of exercises and the ability for users to swap exercises based on their preferences and capabilities. For instance, not everyone can perform a single leg Romanian deadlift, and the app should offer suitable alternatives. Moreover, the app's exercise recommendations are questionable. Suggesting the same exercise for three consecutive days can be harmful and increase the risk of injury due to overuse. A well-designed fitness app should prioritize variety and recovery to ensure users' safety and long-term progress. In conclusion, while the app's concept is commendable, it falls short in execution. The absence of essential features, limited exercise options, and potentially harmful recommendations make it difficult to justify its high cost. To provide true value to users, the developers must address these shortcomings and incorporate user feedback. Until then, users might be better off exploring alternative fitness apps that offer a more comprehensive and thoughtful approach to their fitness journey.