Johnny Hernandez
GBVery bad board Very bad board, they closed our account with out any prior notice and refused to disclose any reasons as to why, they did not refund the money and we have been using there board since 2019. Very disappointed in there service.
WC DC
GBMy last 10 years of experience using DAT Power. I have been working with DAT throughout the last 10 years as a dispatcher and this is the best load board that currently exists. The amount of loads as well as freight market data is unbeatable. Data especially helps you a lot in understanding the market better and making better business decisions.
Thai Walton
GBWhat is DAT doing ?! I am a affiliate for the DAT Power loadboard. I have been using it for 2 years now. I just discovered that in the free trial version, users are no longer able to view rates. Who made this decision because it did not used to be like this? If I were a new user, I would not sign up due to the fact that the free trial makes my experience more difficult & time consuming. This was not a good business move on behalf of DAT. Can this be reversed? I also don't like the new platform. Thankfully I can still search from the old platform. DAT needs to give people the option to choose between the old platform and new - also not lowballing on the free trial because it's honestly misleading and serves no purpose if you can't see rates. It makes it much harder to sift through loads. DAT also has alot of fraud going on so it's starting to become a low end board. I really want to keep promoting this brand but I am not happy with changes!
Fasterry LLC
GBWe have a great partnership Great company with competitive loads to beat. One of the largest load boards in North America for carriers to bid, and for brokers to service their clients. Simply the best. DAT was used by our sister company with amazing experience, and we are now partners.
Taras Shpyrka
GBData interpretation by DAT. I've come to realization that "general market rate" that everyone is referring to is created on DAT mainframe using a blunt way of data interpretation when it comes to TL and LTL shipments. I have requested a deeper look into an issue and asked to be kept in the loop of this investigation. In other words, data collected from TMS does NOT reflect the difference between TL shipment requests and LTL partial loads. This failure in data interpretation affects so called "market per mile rate" in certain regions to the point of making it difficult and not cost efficient to move the freight. This affects road safety and general well being of truck drivers. I'd really like that addressed and fixed on your end. Thank you.