The recommendations made 3 years ago… The recommendations made 3 years ago tanked. Now they are being recommended again without any explanation on what changed. Your claims are often by closing the most beneficial time period to justify the predictions

Thourough analyses and reviews of stock… Thourough analyses and reviews of stock recommendations also laying out pros and cons and the appropriate "audience" for a certain stock. Investment horizon leans heavily towards long term.

I am mostly pleased... Well you recommend stocks that perform well. Especially when I became a member back in '16. Especially NVDA! I think you could do better advising to sell before companies tank. And I wish you had put a buy on NVDA when it reached a low of $108 or so in the recent past.

Always 10 other companies I like alot of the content and context the Motley Fool puts out. However, I have always been curious at how you can look up Motley Fool news about 100% of the public companies and the Motley Fool always has 10 better companies that they would recommend. If there are not any other public companies, how can they recommend 10 better ones? Is there a parallel universe stock market or is Motley Fool more interested in getting your money?

Good recs; too many solicitations to upgrade Generally good recommendations over the years and have learned a lot and done a few % better than the S&P500 over the long haul (~25 years). But there are too many long-winded solicitations to upgrade my subscription.