Good recs; too many solicitations to upgrade Generally good recommendations over the years and have learned a lot and done a few % better than the S&P500 over the long haul (~25 years). But there are too many long-winded solicitations to upgrade my subscription.

The recommendations made 3 years ago… The recommendations made 3 years ago tanked. Now they are being recommended again without any explanation on what changed. Your claims are often by closing the most beneficial time period to justify the predictions

Lots of Information Though the different service offerings can be overwhelming, The Motley Fool tries to provide education and recommendations to all types of investors. Investors needs to know themselves, risk tolerance, stage of life, etc., and then choose the right service(s). I really appreciate that they are willing and actively trying to improve, as well as ask for feedback. The new "Scorecard" updates provided by two analysts are fantastic, as are the "What Do We Think Now" articles.

See my note above about: PAYC, APPN, CHWY, OKTA and U. Some of the recommended stocks have performed very poorly. This includes PAYC, APPN, CHWY, OKTA and U. If not for some of the better performers like NVDA and TTD my portfolio would be well under water. If I have just selected an S&P 500 Fund I would have been better off.

Always 10 other companies I like alot of the content and context the Motley Fool puts out. However, I have always been curious at how you can look up Motley Fool news about 100% of the public companies and the Motley Fool always has 10 better companies that they would recommend. If there are not any other public companies, how can they recommend 10 better ones? Is there a parallel universe stock market or is Motley Fool more interested in getting your money?