I am mostly pleased... Well you recommend stocks that perform well. Especially when I became a member back in '16. Especially NVDA! I think you could do better advising to sell before companies tank. And I wish you had put a buy on NVDA when it reached a low of $108 or so in the recent past.

Always 10 other companies I like alot of the content and context the Motley Fool puts out. However, I have always been curious at how you can look up Motley Fool news about 100% of the public companies and the Motley Fool always has 10 better companies that they would recommend. If there are not any other public companies, how can they recommend 10 better ones? Is there a parallel universe stock market or is Motley Fool more interested in getting your money?

Lots of Information Though the different service offerings can be overwhelming, The Motley Fool tries to provide education and recommendations to all types of investors. Investors needs to know themselves, risk tolerance, stage of life, etc., and then choose the right service(s). I really appreciate that they are willing and actively trying to improve, as well as ask for feedback. The new "Scorecard" updates provided by two analysts are fantastic, as are the "What Do We Think Now" articles.

Good recs; too many solicitations to upgrade Generally good recommendations over the years and have learned a lot and done a few % better than the S&P500 over the long haul (~25 years). But there are too many long-winded solicitations to upgrade my subscription.

Consistent Choices I like the MF approach to picking stocks. I like holding on to stocks. I like the diversity of suggested buys. With the exception of the covid period, my MF stocks have done very well.