Mick Madsen
DKPoor science Poor, unsupported scientific conclusions lacking causation. It appears somewhat ideological to me.
Duc Pham
SGHalf-truths at best Mostly unsubstantiated claims, intent on misleading people by stating half-truths and omissions of important information.
Lydia
GBLife changing Hilarious that the negative reviews state that he doesn't site sources. His organization and book goes through literally tens of thousands of studies every year. I can only assume the negative reviews come from biased employees of certain industries, or they've never actually read a single thing he has written and are just turned off my having to face the reality that what they are eating is probably killing them.
Elliot W
GBBrilliant evidence based nutrition! I have applied most of Dr Greger’s findings to my own life with great success. I have no heart disease, type 2 diabetes and am living an enjoyable life. His videos are brilliantly thought out.
CM
CAExcellent source for a clear overview of the current science. Logical, plain language reviews of published science. Asks the right questions. Critically evaluates the studies on each topic.You can see the original studies for yourself. When conclusions can’t be drawn, he says so. Practical and useful. Unbiased.