National Geographic

image
1.50
Based on 20 Reviews

5

5.00%

4

5.00%

3

0.00%

2

15.00%

1

75.00%
About National Geographic

National Geographic provides free maps, photos, videos and daily news stories, as well as articles and features about animals, the environment, cultures, history, world music and travel.

Tags

You need to Login first to submit your review.

image
Adam
GB

Digital membership didnt work; no service Signed up for a paid digital membership: content was good, when I could read it. Every article I tried reading would hit me a paywall popup telling me to subscribe, despite the fact I am was subcribed, logged in, and paying. Sometimes they would go away after waiting a while, sometimes the payway would not go away. Customer service sucks. They don't even respond. Never responded to multiple emails requesting they cancle my membership and stop charging me.. Tired of having my mailbox filled up with stuff I cant read, I clicked unsubscribe. Nat geo site responds 'it may take 10 days' for the system to stop spamming me. 10 days? Hell even junk mail marketing from boner pill salemen will stop immediately when you hit that unsubscribe button.. Nat geo/disney, you suck

image
ADRIAN SIMPKINS
GB

The Nat Geo mag was once a venerated… The Nat Geo mag was once a venerated chronicle of people and places—no more. It has digressed into a pop culture social rag with issues found on every media site. Its become “Mother Jones” with an Atlas. Too bad! It desperately needs another editorial team in order to restore it former glory.

image
AK
AU

Low quality popscience with no integrity I used to love Nat Geo's magazines and read stacks of old issues almost cover to cover back when I assumed that the content was genuine and scientific. The illusion first shattered when I discovered the "Dog Whisperer" TV show that masqueraded abuse as dog training, and saw that Nat Geo just ignored all the damning critique from highly educated actual behaviour specialists, who implored them to stop the show because it is 1. unscientific, and 2. likely to harm many pet dogs as viewers try to emulate Millan's methods from the popular show. Nat Geo continued the show year after year because the show is popular, and because science, ethics and integrity apparently does not matter... all the sciency gloss is just pretend

image
Charles Ritz
PH

People handling subscriptions are a disaster Almost a year ago I paid for a subscription to Nat Geo History. Everything was correct, but from day one they got my address INCORRECT and despite all my complaining e-mails, they have continued to do so for almost a FULL YEAR and I have yet to recieve a single copy. They are apparantly unaccountable for such mistakes and are certainly uncaring, or they would had made things right by now. Read the other reviews with people with similar problems. I feel nothing but frustration and anger for such avoidable incompetence and only wish I could be listened to.

image
Jim
GB

Down the Tubes I have been a National Geographic member/subscriber for over 50 years. I read my parents magazines for almost 20 years before that. I will be a member no longer. I can no longer tolerate the racist, sexist bent of this once vibrant magazine. The editor has brought her lack of scientific background and personal prejudices to bear on her work--where it has no place. Every issue is has become a far left opinion piece instead of fact-based story with broad interest. Too bad.

We may use cookies or any other tracking technologies when you visit our website, including any other media form, mobile website, or mobile application related or connected to help customize the Site and improve your experience. learn more

Allow