Graham Smilebox
GBworth every penny integration was simple, easy for us to implement and easy for our customers to use. also, very cost effective, for the price I could not hire a developer to maintain all of the functionality it offers.
Dwight Gunnarson
GBGreat Product, Easy to Implement, Very Poor with Rackspace This is a slick program but if you need urls from your Rackspace storage, forget it. It is their policy not to put the urls in the returned json. So good luck trying to store those urls. Ugh.
Kirill
GBWorks but not maintained File picker was/is a great idea, but ever since buying it from the original team, you have dropped the ball -- documentation is shiitake and updates are few. You can make this the best file picking product, and instead u r keeping it in the state it was two years ago. Only a matter of when a better product is created
Miroslav
HRInsanely simple and reach with features I'm using Filepicker for a couple of years now and it saved me a ton of time both on my client's projects as well as my own projects. It's simple and easy to integrate, there's almost no feature missing. In some cases may seem a bit expensive, for example when having a lot of users or/and large files.
Konstantin
DEGreat transition for implementing own S3 upload Filepicker is a nice tool for uploading files - we use it to upload to amazon S3. For now i am really happy with using filepicker but there are two minor flaws and one show stopper (specific for our B2B customers) which let us change to an own implementation. The first flaw is that i can not use S3 in frankfurt because of filepicker not supporting the AWS Signature Version 4. The second is the poor interface for uploading from Google drive - it is hard to navigate to your files. What really causes the pain for leaving is rather a problem of our customers. The bigger companies we are working with are blocking filepicker within their proxies. Overall we are still satisfied =)