Number wouldn't port. We couldn't port our existing fax number. We liked the software, but it wasn't worth the amount of work that would go into changing the fax number everywhere for a doctor's office, nor did we want to pay for two services so that we could forward our number.

So far so good We have been using sFax for a number of months now. It's working well except we are having a bit of trouble porting existing numbers which seems to take up to 2 weeks.

Solid Niche Player with Next Level Potential Scrypt's SFax is a solid HIPAA compliant offering with the API's, interface partnerships, and platform to provide great value to healthcare companies of all sizes. They are priced very well. What is holding them back in eFax is mobile application support for Android devices which would allow more customers to ditch expensive copper line contracts. While they have other products, none stand out as much as SFax. Their partnerships with EMR vendors and their print capture driver will help increase exposure. Their secure messaging platform is in a crowded field, but is worth a look while we are shopping other vendors.

Not as effective receiving faxes as a traditional machine. We are unable to receive all faxes. 5% of income faxes are never received and we have to direct people to fax to our back office fax line Update: I have tried multiple times to have this issue resolved through support. I am told the person sending the fax has a problem with their phone line. but yet they can fax to my back office fax no problem. Tell me how that makes sense?

thi ha could be bettet Why is it that when my company receives and sends faxes, I get three emails telling me each time? It didn't used to be this way, but my email notifications are tripled. I wish there was a way to call and talk with a representative rather then send an email each time I have a need or question. The lag time is just too slow sometimes to get done what I need to do.