Gregory
GBNot as effective receiving faxes as a traditional machine. We are unable to receive all faxes. 5% of income faxes are never received and we have to direct people to fax to our back office fax line Update: I have tried multiple times to have this issue resolved through support. I am told the person sending the fax has a problem with their phone line. but yet they can fax to my back office fax no problem. Tell me how that makes sense?
Greg Smith
GBTerrible They have no tech support. No one answers the phone or responds to emails. Unable to renew our account online so now my account is locked. They now have our fax numbers hostage. User interface is form the 90s. Stay Away from this company.
M. Scott
GBNumber wouldn't port. We couldn't port our existing fax number. We liked the software, but it wasn't worth the amount of work that would go into changing the fax number everywhere for a doctor's office, nor did we want to pay for two services so that we could forward our number.
Jessica
GBLocks me out too fast As an efax it has many features I like and expect, tracking, ability to look back etc. But Everytime I leave the page I have to sign back in. It is often very slow to load, and cumbersome to search. It's just OK
Troy
GBSolid Niche Player with Next Level Potential Scrypt's SFax is a solid HIPAA compliant offering with the API's, interface partnerships, and platform to provide great value to healthcare companies of all sizes. They are priced very well. What is holding them back in eFax is mobile application support for Android devices which would allow more customers to ditch expensive copper line contracts. While they have other products, none stand out as much as SFax. Their partnerships with EMR vendors and their print capture driver will help increase exposure. Their secure messaging platform is in a crowded field, but is worth a look while we are shopping other vendors.