Module Federation
CADo NOT use this product. Bad support! Do NOT use this product because of bad customer service. Whenever I need help with support, they always tell me to put in a feature request or give me an article that I can google myself. They asked me to fill out a survey. I left negative feedback. They escalated to the upper management of my company. That's a good way to respond to negative feedback. Impressive!
Irvin Dominin
ITNo Need to Reinvent the Wheel With Syncfusion’s JavaScript suite, we have a lot of components ready to use; each component offer some events to bind and customize its behaviour. We could use business-ready, updated web and mobile UI components. These days, it’s impossible, time and money-wise, to think about writing complex UI web-mobile plugins yourself. On application side, Syncfusion offers a powerfull suite for manage xls and doc formats, and a great support portal.
JY Park
KRDynamic Company, Syncfusion I think WinUI is not that popular framework yet. Syncfusion already prepared the best WinUI framework. I chose WinUI for legacy c++ libraries use in .NET framework. I am new to WinUI and there were not many articles I can refer to about WinUI. Syncfusion provides awesome WinUI Controls include beautiful Chart libraries and Grid control. especially Charts with animation is really good. I also like your active support too. Syncfusion contacted me first and asked if I have questions. so I replied with some questions about WinUI Controls. Then I could get the solution quickly. I also saw many other frameworks products. it makes me think of that Syncfusion is very dynamic company and I can get the best help from Syncfusion products in future too.
David Pociu
GBWorth building on A superb set of widgets that works the same in countless frameworks from plain Javascript/Typescript to Angular, React and even Flutter. The company is also very responsive to any bug reports with most issues addressed in 24 hours. Overall, a very solid foundation to build on.
Karl
ITNot so good Other companies, such as Telerik and DevExpress, offer superior products. While they may have fewer components, they are well-tested. With Syncfusion, we've encountered numerous bugs in their controls, resulting in significant time wasted on ticket submissions. The support provided by Syncfusion is subpar; they often take months to address issues and seem indifferent to user feedback. Their proposed solutions frequently fail to address the root problem. Additionally, feature requests remain in evaluation for years without any meaningful response to our requirements. The design of the Blazor components is particularly poor. Given the recent price increase, it's advisable to consider alternatives in the market.