Its greed ruined what was.... Long have I known about IGN and its horrible practices. The first hatred sparked when they sold bought Gamespy and sold the most important part to GLU affecting 1000s of games. Then IGN started dabbling with unethical games journalism which was a part of the real GamerGate, not the reason the established media wants you to believe. And to the last they are now dabbling allot in politics and joining up with organisation who dabbles with cyberbulling, racism and sexism. IGN as a gaming journalist organisation is long gone and its words carries no weight in the balance of truth.

Too Biased Reviews on the site these days are way too biased. Seem to always refer back to why x console/game is superior to y, even when x is a fps and y is a sports game.

Does everything that I ask Does everything that I ask, I usually just use this site for reviews and honestly most of the reviews are honest and ones that are helpful, however, it gets annoying when you realize that it seems a lot of the people that review games seem to be paid. Some games just have an oddly high number for it's rating. Especially shooter series, they are getting way too much praise while platformers are stuck at the bottom simply because a lot of people don't prefer them.

No thank you. Some reviews on games just don't make sense at all, looks like they were written by complete amateurs, its baffling sometimes. Most reviews are either extremely biased or just straight up wrong with pretty hilarious reasons. It seems the site favours corporations over the actual gamers.

Seems ign hires journalists instead of… Seems ign hires journalists instead of gamers to review games since of late and they have a biased point of view. To be able to write an article about à game you should have played à lot of them. Some games seriously dont deserve their ratings and are uterly underrated cause they are not triple A games. Just take "dead cells" review for exemple and you Will clearly see they hire any bunch of low lives.