Reviews a game 4/10 (Cyberpunk) Reviews a game 4/10 (Cyberpunk), because certain systems can't handle it, "Xbox one & ps4" (base consoles). Gives no review of the actual game itself, story, game mechanics, world, character building, etc. Sure it has bugs & glitches that need to be addressed, which are all fixable. That's like reviewing a new car and giving it a 0/10 cause it didn't have gas in it...

They can't give an honest review and no… They can't give an honest review and no longer care about gaming. They're just paid sony reviewers who can't think for themselves. Do not trust ign to review games.

Seems ign hires journalists instead of… Seems ign hires journalists instead of gamers to review games since of late and they have a biased point of view. To be able to write an article about à game you should have played à lot of them. Some games seriously dont deserve their ratings and are uterly underrated cause they are not triple A games. Just take "dead cells" review for exemple and you Will clearly see they hire any bunch of low lives.

Very biased review/information site with a pushed narrative a Very Biased review/information site. You can tell if something is sponsored and not an authentic review, also it's very clear to the reader that they're extremely biased towards Sony/Playstation, it's sad to see as a general gaming fan it's hard to fight past the pushed narrative.

IGN has the most intrusive ads Loved ign, but over the last 5 years their ad policy has become the most intrusive in the gaming industry, so much that u cannot even scroll down the page without it stuttering, reloading, ads auto playing. It’s basically greed, if u need that many ads to keep going, ruining your customer experience, then hey, lower your outgoings/employees/greedy shareholders etc so you can deliver a half decent service. Most of the decent reviewers have lefts it won’t hurt the business if you let a lot of them go. But hey, greed will always come first, especially for American companies