Filters Usually, prefer to use monster to find good candidates. There few things that could be helpful in our search, if few more filters are added to Monster.

In the 12 years that I have been a… In the 12 years that I have been a Recruiter at this firm, I have found Monster to be cumbersome to use. Right away I began to use Career Builder because it is so fluid, and has continued to update through the years. I felt that Monster was lagging WAY behind and only recently made any changes to update its service. I'm too pleased with Career Builder to make any kind of change, in spite of the updates that I have viewed on Monster.

So/So Monster is needed but doesn't add anything spectacular. 5 years ago the Power Search was new and a good tool to have. However the "cool tool" is finicky and I trust my boolean more. I will admit with Linkedin Recruiter now available I now find my best candidates from there.

the first time I used the site … the first time I used the site we received hundreds of appls. this time we received approx.. 90 but we did hire some one from my post so it was successful I think the cost was a little high for the number of responses but it worked and this is the second time I have used monstor and it has produced both times ps the one hiring always gets stuck with the bill the one doing the hiring should be the one being PAID todd j stephens president stephens insurance

Easy to use. Easy to use. Better search results. Good Pool of candidates. The bad thing is that many of the resumes does not have their contact information mentioned in their resumes.