Lori
GBMonster last place I use to source I don't like that I can't just click from one resume to the next without going back to search page. It's inefficient and cumbersome. This really keeps me from utilizing your site. Also there should be a way to filter work authorizations. I don't mind 3rd party resumes, I do mind when it's misleading to make me believe that I'm reaching out to a candidate when I'm really reaching out to an employer.
Valued Customer
INFilters Usually, prefer to use monster to find good candidates. There few things that could be helpful in our search, if few more filters are added to Monster.
Daniel
GBTypical key word search company Monster claims they match people not key words. The majority of applicants for a field position in excavating were applying for administrative employment.....Totally opposite ends of the spectrum..... All due to one word in the ad. (assistant). Be careful of your wording. I did call and have the wording changed the person who "assisted" me was professional and helpful. I wonder if she replied to an ad on Monster!!!
Rajiv
INEasy to use. Easy to use. Better search results. Good Pool of candidates. The bad thing is that many of the resumes does not have their contact information mentioned in their resumes.
Todd Stephens
GBthe first time I used the site … the first time I used the site we received hundreds of appls. this time we received approx.. 90 but we did hire some one from my post so it was successful I think the cost was a little high for the number of responses but it worked and this is the second time I have used monstor and it has produced both times ps the one hiring always gets stuck with the bill the one doing the hiring should be the one being PAID todd j stephens president stephens insurance