Two of our recent papers Two of our recent papers, both with extensive references that were much easier to manipulate with EndNote. One paper has already been published in May of last year and another is currently in review. I would have dreaded keeping track of these references "by hand". George E. Davis, MD, FACP, FACG

The interface is as clunky online as it… The interface is as clunky online as it is in the desktop app. Also, when it's so easy to just plug a DOI into a website and pull an article, or find similar articles using multiple free sources (e.g., research rabbit, elicit, google scholar) I do not find it worthwhile to use endnote for these purposes.

Long-Time researcher I have been using EndNote since 1995. It was an inherently important part of my doctoral research. The ability to create multiple libraries was important. The ability to change format styles is very important as I present and publish papers in different venues. There as more features in EndNotes that I do not use, but I have not had the time to really did deep into the latest version.

ENDNOTE is good but room for improvement exists. ENDNOTE can help organize thousands of references and conduct Boolean searches even within PDF files. The ability to FIND FULL TEXT works only about 50% of the time. There is no AI option to summarize content in one or more PDF files. CiteWhileYouWrite works ok with WORD, but annoying "bugs" exist.

There's no replacement for EndNote when… There's no replacement for EndNote when you want to inventory useful articles, find them again, and then footnote your paper. I have trouble syncing across Macs and also the pdf annotater is a bit limited compared to earlier EndNote versions. EndNote also sometimes corrupts my pdf's so I need to keep duplicates in a separate file. All in all, though, I couldn't live without the app.